Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
10:00
at the front page and like, it's pretty likely
10:02
there'll be a mention of a bomb going off
10:04
somewhere. It just, statistically, it was just happening all
10:06
the time. And
10:09
how much of this disruption was tied to
10:11
the anarchists in the public mind? Like how
10:13
looming a threat was the anarchist movement? Yeah,
10:16
a lot of it was. There is
10:18
a kind of a blurring of lines
10:20
between the socialists and the communists and
10:22
the IWW and the anarchists. And they
10:24
were, you know, bedfellows and in some
10:26
ways, not largely disagreeing
10:28
about the role of the state, right?
10:30
That they were equally opposed to big
10:32
capitalism, but the anarchists also felt that
10:35
big government was as much of a
10:37
problem. So there was a
10:39
general sense of radicals were causing this political violence.
10:41
Right, and one of those radicals that you talk
10:43
about in the book is Emma Goldman.
10:45
Could you tell me about her and what her
10:47
role in the anarchist movement was? Emma
10:50
Goldman, you know, is one of the
10:52
most endlessly fascinating figures of
10:54
this period. A Russian émigré came over.
10:56
That much actual education came over as
10:58
a teenager to the United States, somehow
11:01
was giving lectures on
11:03
radical politics within a couple
11:06
of years of her arrival here, became
11:08
the leading figure of
11:10
the anarchist movement, arguably worldwide by the
11:12
first decades of the 20th century, and
11:15
had a very complicated
11:18
relationship to political violence. She had
11:20
had this long time partnership, really
11:22
what turned out to be a
11:24
lifelong partnership with Alexander Berkman, who
11:26
had a much less complicated relationship
11:28
to political violence, and had
11:30
notoriously attempted to assassinate Henry Clay
11:33
Frick in the early 1890s, gone
11:36
to prison for more than a decade. But
11:38
those early experiences, which Goldman had been
11:40
largely supportive of, had kind of turned her
11:42
against the use of political violence in
11:45
her writings, in her public statements. This
11:47
is right around the time that Gandhi is kind
11:49
of formalizing the principles of nonviolent protest.
11:52
And if Goldman had really, in a
11:54
full-throated way, embraced those, or
11:56
had hit upon them independently, the whole
11:58
history of the anarchist movement. where
20:00
the anarchist movement is really active. There are these
20:02
bombs going off all over the city, and
20:05
there's this real fear of the anarchist movement
20:07
and what these so-called radicals can do. And
20:09
at the same time, all this is going on,
20:11
you've got the police and the government trying to
20:14
figure out how to regain some kind of control
20:16
of the situation. But they don't exactly have the
20:18
tools to do it. Could you tell
20:20
me more about this? So up until, you
20:23
know, the late 1880s, the
20:25
idea of true detective
20:27
work being done with
20:29
scientific tools, like for instance,
20:31
fingerprint science, and done in
20:33
a formal way
20:36
with complex records, histories
20:39
of people convicted of crimes,
20:42
identification systems, including fingerprints,
20:44
all that stuff just didn't exist. And
20:47
crucially, this is another thing that I think
20:49
is so important to this story. There was
20:51
really no federal
20:53
investigative force. There was no
20:55
FBI. There was a Bureau
20:58
of Investigation that was chronically kind
21:00
of underfunded. There had generally been
21:02
a suspicion, kind
21:04
of an old school American suspicion of
21:06
consolidating too much power, particularly kind of
21:08
investigative power in the federal government.
21:11
If you were charged with a
21:13
federal crime, like you could be charged with a crime,
21:15
but it was very hard to prove it because there
21:17
was no system, there were no people on payroll, basically,
21:19
who could kind of marshal the evidence together to prove
21:21
that you were guilty. But soon,
21:23
fingerprint science develops alongside all
21:25
these other technologies that we'd
21:27
call biometrics today. Yeah, and
21:29
because there was no national
21:32
institution in the United States to
21:35
use these new advances in confronting the
21:37
threat of anarchism, the
21:39
real pioneers in adopting these new
21:42
techniques happened on a city level
21:44
and particularly happened in New York. And
21:46
so how did the police start using these new tools and
21:48
techniques? Yeah, New York, between 1900
21:50
and 1920, really reinvents
21:53
itself as a state
21:55
of the art police department led by a
21:58
few people like Joseph Fereau. Arthur
22:00
Woods, who adopt these new tools.
22:02
In many cases, they travel over to Europe to kind
22:04
of find out about them and come back. And, you
22:06
know, one of the things that I think is just
22:08
so extraordinary is the basic lack
22:10
of identification systems throughout
22:13
the 19th century. Like people
22:15
didn't largely have passports or
22:17
driver's licenses or obviously or
22:19
any kind of biometric evidence
22:22
for who they were. So if you were arrested
22:24
for a crime, you could just say they'd be
22:26
like, what's your name? And you could say, my
22:28
name is Bill Jones. And there
22:30
was on some level, there's no way to
22:32
prove that you were not Bill Jones, even
22:34
if you'd just been arrested three days ago
22:37
under another name. And so just the basic
22:39
ability to capture people's identity
22:41
and prove that they were that person
22:44
and that they were the person who had been convicted of
22:46
a crime or suspected of
22:48
a crime two years ago
22:50
or five years ago was an enormous
22:53
leap forward. And biometrics and fingerprinting and
22:55
photography and all that, you really introduced
22:57
that. And the power of something
22:59
like fingerprint technology takes a little while to
23:01
gain popularity. And there's this incredible court case
23:03
that you read about that really
23:05
shepherds in this era of forensic
23:07
science. Could you tell us
23:09
that story? Yeah, it's a case against
23:11
a burglar named Charles Crispy who had broken
23:14
into a Soho loft and stolen some, I
23:16
believe, undergarments. I think it was kind of
23:18
a lady's undergarment story.
23:21
And he left behind
23:23
a fingerprint and it matched a previous
23:25
fingerprint. And the fingerprint evidence was really
23:28
like central to the case.
23:30
But no one had ever been successfully
23:32
convicted of a crime based on fingerprint evidence
23:34
before that. So what does Furo end up
23:36
doing? Furo, who has
23:39
kind of built up this against
23:41
a lot of resistance internally at the
23:43
NYPD, he's built up this small identification
23:45
bureau and he's pretty much
23:47
the fingerprint guy inside the NYPD.
23:49
This is like 1911 and he has called in. It's
23:53
pretty much the only witness for
23:56
the prosecution because they really don't have any other evidence
23:58
other than this fingerprint. So,
24:00
Feroz is testifying and he's asked
24:03
to explain his method, and he just like rolls
24:06
out this crazy explanation that clearly
24:08
just bombs in the room. So
24:11
what does the prosecution do then? So
24:13
they come back and they basically are like, we'd
24:15
like to do an experiment. We'd like to do
24:17
a demo in a sense of this technology for
24:19
the jury so that they can understand it. And
24:22
they basically have Fero leave
24:25
the room and the jurors come
24:27
through, and one of the jurors presses
24:30
his finger against
24:32
a pane of glass, simulating what
24:34
Charles Crispy, the accused criminal, had
24:36
done. And then all the
24:38
other jurors, including the one who pressed his
24:41
finger on the glass, do a traditional fingerprint
24:43
impression. And they bring
24:45
Fero back, and then Fero
24:47
is basically seated in front of the jury,
24:49
and he has to identify which juror has
24:52
put their finger on the glass, and he nails it. He
24:54
goes through and he like picks it out, and he's like, it's
24:56
this juror right here. And
24:59
the jury is like, what is this witchcraft?
25:03
Just blown away, what is this incredible
25:05
display of his scientific power? And
25:07
almost instantly Crispy changes his plea
25:10
to guilty. He
25:12
just sees the scientific fire fire that's up
25:14
against him and he gives in. Right,
25:18
because before this, someone who committed a
25:20
crime could really just essentially disappear. Like
25:22
an anarchist could throw a stichodymite into
25:25
a church or something, and then
25:27
disappear into the crowd. But the
25:29
advent of these new technologies really
25:31
takes away that anonymity. Yeah,
25:34
and so the tide starts to turn
25:36
inside the NYPD, and then this Arthur
25:38
Woods figure becomes commissioner, who's very interested
25:41
in these things. They build up the
25:43
information architecture that allows them to
25:45
kind of track criminals, and they
25:48
increasingly are using that to investigate
25:50
the anarchists and other political attacks
25:52
in New York in that period.
25:54
And that infrastructure then
25:57
becomes the basis of what leads
25:59
to... the consolidation of this
26:01
kind of investigatory power on a federal level.
26:04
And as the police departments and the federal government
26:06
are gathering all this information, they
26:08
need a way to organize all of it.
26:10
And this is where another key historical figure
26:13
comes into the picture, and that's J. Edgar
26:15
Hoover. Could you tell me about
26:17
Hoover's contribution here and how this all collides
26:19
with the history of the anarchists? Yeah,
26:22
Hoover had basically moonlit in
26:24
D.C. when he was in high school and
26:28
in college as a library clerk, and
26:31
he was organizing, helping to organize the
26:33
Library of Congress's voluminous collections. And
26:35
there had been a new system that had
26:37
been introduced around this period by the former
26:39
director of the Library of Congress, whose name
26:42
was Putnam. And Putnam had
26:44
introduced basically something similar to the
26:46
Dewey Decimal system. It was basically like, hey,
26:48
we have all these books and they're in
26:50
different categories and they have authors. And
26:53
so we'll figure out a systematic way
26:55
of taking this information so that you
26:57
can explore, it was
26:59
really on some level, like what we would now
27:02
call a search algorithm. He
27:04
then goes to work for
27:06
the Justice Department and it's,
27:08
you know, World War I is still evolving.
27:11
The United States is not yet involved
27:13
in the war, but country's moving in
27:15
that direction. And there's serious concern about
27:17
German nationals inside of the United States,
27:19
who are also actually setting off bombs
27:21
on their own during this period. And
27:23
so Hoover gets assigned
27:25
to run the New York branch of
27:28
the big push to register
27:30
all the German nationals
27:32
living in the United States, which is arguably
27:34
like the largest kind of
27:37
identification management roundup in United
27:39
States history at that point. And Hoover's really
27:41
good at it. He's something like 23 or
27:43
24. And he,
27:45
you know, wins the praise
27:48
of his superiors. And so shortly after that,
27:50
after these bombs are starting to go off
27:53
in 1918 and 1919, the
27:56
Bureau of Investigation opens up a new division
27:58
called the Radical Division. And
28:00
the radical division is going to be
28:03
charged with rounding up these dangerous
28:05
anarchists and communists that are setting
28:07
off these bombs all across the
28:10
country using these new state-of-the-art information
28:12
science crime-fighting techniques. And they put
28:14
J. Edgar Hoover in charge of the radical
28:17
division. And Hoover's
28:19
first guiding quest is
28:21
to use this
28:23
new information science to
28:27
see that Emma Goldman is deported from
28:29
the United States of America. She
28:31
and Berkman had been sent to jail for encouraging
28:34
draft resistance leading up into World
28:36
War I. So in this
28:38
period, Goldman has been released
28:41
from prison, but the mood in the
28:43
country is very much kind of turning
28:45
against these radicals, the kind of endless
28:47
bombing campaigns that have happened. There have
28:50
been many more. And so Hoover, in
28:53
really his first act as head
28:55
of the radical division,
28:57
collects just an enormous amount
28:59
of information on Goldman and
29:01
Alexander Berkman, just going through.
29:04
I've seen all these files and
29:06
it's just extraordinary how much—it's the
29:08
whole book, basically, of information of
29:10
speeches she'd given. And he's organized
29:12
it all systematically. He's kind of
29:14
annotated everything. And it's precisely the
29:16
kind of information gathering and management
29:18
that the federal government just had
29:21
been incapable of doing before. It's
29:23
just a case that could not
29:25
have been made before. And
29:27
Hoover, for the first time, has kind of
29:29
marshaled all this information. And so it was
29:31
a kind of really intense moment where there's
29:34
a deportation hearing on Ellis Island. And
29:36
Goldman is there and Hoover shows
29:38
up and Goldman looks over and
29:41
Hoover just has these stacks of
29:44
paper on his desk. And
29:46
it's all the evidence that he's put together
29:48
to finally make the case that Emma Goldman
29:51
needs to leave the country for good. And
29:54
she kind of looks over there and she says
29:57
to herself, I'm not going to be able to
29:59
fight this. So
30:01
Hoover ends up successfully deporting
30:03
her and Berkman along with
30:05
a number of other radicals. They
30:08
leave in one of the last days of 1919
30:10
aboard a ship that the
30:12
press dubbed the Red Ark and
30:15
they sail out through the
30:18
New York harbor and end up
30:20
in Leninist Russia, where they are
30:22
instantly disillusioned with everything
30:24
that is happening there. It's interesting
30:26
that this whole story is taking place in the
30:28
backdrop of these two designs which work in
30:31
opposite directions. Like if you simplify them to
30:33
their most basic concepts, dynamite
30:35
is this destructive power that
30:38
creates chaos and information science
30:40
is basically trying to order everything, to put
30:42
everything back together. And ultimately
30:45
what you see is this sequence of
30:47
events where dynamite supercharges the anarchist movement,
30:49
which leads to the supercharging of the
30:52
forensic sciences and that ultimately
30:54
snuffed out the anarchist movement. And then
30:56
the surveillance state ascends and
30:58
it has its own destructive and pernicious
31:00
power. Well, I think one of
31:02
the things is
31:05
how long it took me to see it that way.
31:07
But they were kind of invisible, I
31:10
think. Not to
31:12
be too on brand here, but like they were... That
31:16
kind of, I don't know, like
31:18
high level clash between
31:21
technologies or approaches or
31:23
designs that come into
31:25
being slowly over time.
31:27
Yeah. It's almost
31:29
like a very slow motion film that
31:32
nothing seems to be happening when you watch it
31:34
at that slow speed. When you're
31:36
watching it over like 40 years, it seems
31:39
like there's just little isolated things happening. But
31:42
then when you speed it up, you realize, oh, this is
31:44
really a crash between these two different forces. But
31:47
once you see it that way, it
31:49
is very illuminating. Steven
31:52
Nelson, thank you so much for being on 99% of us. It
31:54
was a real pleasure to talk to you. Oh, Roman, I love
31:56
the show and it's such an honor to be on it. Stephen
32:17
Johnson's new book is called The Infernal Machine,
32:19
a true story of dynamite, terror, and the
32:21
rise of the modern detective. You can find
32:23
a link to the book in our show
32:25
notes, and you can also just go to
32:28
a store or go online and just buy
32:30
every Stephen Johnson book because they're all so,
32:32
so good. 99%
32:36
Invisible was produced this week by Jacob
32:38
Maldonado Medina and edited by Nina Patek,
32:40
mixed by Martin Gonzalez, music by Swan
32:42
Rial. Kathy Tu is our
32:45
executive producer, Kurt Kholstedt is the
32:47
digital director, Delaney Hall is our
32:49
senior editor, Taylor Shedrick is our
32:51
intern. The rest of the team
32:53
includes Chris Barrupe, Jason De Leon,
32:55
Emmett Fitzgerald, Christopher Johnson, Vivian Lay,
32:57
Loshma Dawn, Joe Rosenberg, Gabriela Gladney,
32:59
Kelly Prime, and me, Roman
33:01
Mars. The 99% Invisible logo
33:03
was created by Stefan Lawrence. We
33:06
are part of the Stitcher and SiriusXM
33:08
podcast family, now headquartered six blocks north
33:10
in the Pandora building in beautiful uptown
33:14
Oakland, California, home
33:16
of the Oakland Roots Soccer Club, of which
33:18
I'm a proud community owner. Other
33:21
teams may come and go, but the
33:23
Roots are Oakland first, always.
33:26
You can find us on all the usual social
33:28
media sites, as well as our brand new Discord
33:30
server. There's like 5,000 beautiful nerds there talking about
33:32
architecture, talking about the power broker, talking about all
33:34
kinds of things. There's a link to that as
33:36
well as every past episode of 99PI at 99pi.org.
33:53
T-Mobile 5G Internet keeps getting better. Boost your connection
33:55
to harder to reach places with Home Internet Plus
33:57
and get internet right where you want it. With
34:00
wifi that reaches the attic, I finally have
34:02
a home office. Get T-Mobile Home
34:04
Internet Plus for 50 bucks a month with
34:07
auto pay and a Go 5G Plus line.
34:09
Check availability at t-mobile.com/home internet. During
34:11
congestion, customers on this plan may notice speeds lower than other
34:13
customers and further reduction if using greater than 1.2 terabytes per
34:16
month due to data prioritization. After $20 Go credit
34:18
plus $5 per month without auto pay, debit bank
34:20
account required, regulatory fees included for qualifying accounts, $35
34:22
connection charge applied. This
34:25
show is sponsored by BetterHelp. October
34:28
is the season for wearing masks and costumes, but
34:30
some of us feel like we wear a mask
34:32
and hide more often than we want to, at
34:35
work, in social settings, around our family
34:37
even. You can get so used to
34:39
secreting away parts of yourself, you know,
34:42
to be of service, to avoid conflict,
34:44
that you lose touch with who you
34:46
are. Therapy can help you learn to
34:48
accept all parts of yourself so you
34:50
can take off the mask because masks
34:53
should be for Halloween fun and for
34:55
scaring little children and other fun
34:57
stuff related to the holiday, not
34:59
for our emotions. If you're
35:02
thinking of starting therapy, give BetterHelp a
35:04
try. It's entirely online, designed to be
35:06
convenient, flexible, and suited to your schedule.
35:08
Just fill out a brief questionnaire to
35:10
get matched with a licensed therapist and
35:12
switch therapists at any time for no
35:14
additional charge. Visit
35:16
betterhelp.com/invisible today
35:19
to get 10% off your first
35:21
month. That's betterhelp, h-e-l-p.com/
35:25
invisible. Hello, beautiful nerds.
35:27
This is Roman Mars. You can now listen
35:29
to new episodes of 99% Invisible ad-free by
35:33
subscribing to SiriusXM Podcast Plus.
35:35
That's ad-free 99 PI. Plus,
35:38
you'll get some exclusive AMAs from
35:40
me, plus ad-free feeds of your other
35:42
favorite SiriusXM shows, plus you'll directly support
35:45
the work we do here. It's all
35:47
pluses. Subscribe to SiriusXM Podcast Plus
35:49
on our Apple Podcast show page right
35:52
now.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More